Does the brain's wiring predict where Parkinson's spreads?
✓ Numbers check out
Counts as holding up
The code and data produced the same result. That doesn't prove the study's method is right.
The rerun confirmed the reported correlation: the authors' R code, run on their published mouse-brain data, produced a correlation of about 0.696 between predicted and measured spread of alpha-synuclein, matching the published number.
Alpha-synuclein is the protein that builds up in the brains of people with Parkinson's disease. The study modelled how this protein would travel along the brain's physical connections in mice, aiming to see if wiring alone can explain where the protein ends up. Getting the model's predictions to line up with actual lab measurements would support the idea that brain connectivity shapes the spread.
The check reran the authors' own R code, with software packages pinned to the date the code was written, on their published data. The measured correlation was 0.69605221 against a reported 0.696, so the number checks out. This only confirms that the same code and data reproduce the same figure; it does not verify that the model is correct, that the data were suitable, or that mouse results apply to humans.
The text was written by a private AI model on NEAR AI (z-ai/glm-5.3-flash). The verdict and numbers come straight from the blockchain, and the AI can't change them.
- What the paper said
- Pearson's r 0.696 (Henderson et al.). Table 2 of the ReScience C article, which quotes the original paper
- What we got
- 0.69605221
- Whose code ran
- Authors' own code
- How well known
- Cited by 302 studies
- What forecasters thought
- Nobody forecast this one. We posted it with the result already known, to show how a famous paper looks.
- Proof
- Read the receipt or see claim 24
What we didn't check
- Whether the sample was fair or large enough.
- Whether test data leaked into training or tuning.
- Whether the result holds on new data.
- Whether the study's method was the right one for its question.
- Whether results in mice carry over to people.
Community notes
Notes are people's own words, kept on the blockchain. They never change a verdict, and the Lab's AI never reads them. Posting costs a little NEAR for storage, and what isn't used comes back.